![]() ![]() ![]() Let me say first of all that I am genuinely grateful that Stanley affirms the historicity of Adam and Eve. And if he believed they were historical, I believe they were historical because anybody that can predict their own death and resurrection and pull it off – I just believe anything they say. And it appears to me that he believed they were actually historical figures. Not because the Bible says so, but because of the Gospels – Jesus talks about Adam and Eve. Here’s why I believe this actually happened. The Scripture is simply a collection of ancient documents that tells us that story… And the issue is always – Who is Jesus? That’s always the issue. The foundation of our faith is something that happened in history. The foundation of our faith is not the infallibility of the Bible. ![]() The foundation of our faith is not the Scripture. You can listen to the entire discussion above, but here are the relevant excerpts: Rather, he bases his belief on what Jesus says about Adam and Eve. In short, Stanley affirms the historicity of Adam and Eve, but not because Genesis says so. Andy Stanley’s comments on Adam and Eve have been making the rounds since they appeared on yesterday. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |